From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Roed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
Jul 10, 2015
Case No. 3:13-cv-73 (D.N.D. Jul. 10, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-73

07-10-2015

Cory Allen Taylor, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Jamie Roed, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has received a Report and Recommendation from the Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge, recommending that the court dismiss Cory Taylor's complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Taylor has not objected to the Report and Recommendation within the prescribed time period.

Doc. #45. --------

After reviewing the record and considering the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, the court finds the magistrate judge's analysis of the claims and recommendations for disposition are appropriate. Accordingly, the court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. For the reasons stated therein, Taylor's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated this 10th day of July, 2015.

/s/ Ralph R . Erickson

Ralph R. Erickson, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Taylor v. Roed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
Jul 10, 2015
Case No. 3:13-cv-73 (D.N.D. Jul. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Taylor v. Roed

Case Details

Full title:Cory Allen Taylor, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Jamie Roed, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 10, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-73 (D.N.D. Jul. 10, 2015)