From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sweeney v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 22, 2018
14-CV-402-A (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 22, 2018)

Summary

finding plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact regarding whether she sustained a serious injury under the significant/permanent consequential limitation of use categories, noting that while "disc bulges and herniations alone do not constitute a serious injury . . . Plaintiff submitted additional evidence relating to the extent or degree of her limitations."

Summary of this case from Cabarris v. Knight Transp., Inc.

Opinion

14-CV-402-A

03-22-2018

KATHLEEN M. SWEENEY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


DECISION AND ORDER

This Federal Tort Claims Act case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On February 20, 2018, Magistrate Judge Schroeder filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 39), which recommends that Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 26) be granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Schroeder recommends that Defendant's summary judgment motion be denied as to (1) causation, and (2) Plaintiff's allegations that she sustained a "serious injury," as that term is denied under New York State's No Fault statute, see N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102(d), under a theory of permanent consequential limitation and/or significant limitation. Magistrate Judge Schroeder further recommended that Defendant's motion be granted with respect to the Plaintiff's claim that she suffered a "serious injury" under the "90/180" category. See N.Y. Ins. Law § 5102(d).

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Schroeder's Report and Recommendation, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.

The parties shall appear on April 12, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. for a meeting to set a trail date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dated: March 22, 2018


Summaries of

Sweeney v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 22, 2018
14-CV-402-A (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 22, 2018)

finding plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact regarding whether she sustained a serious injury under the significant/permanent consequential limitation of use categories, noting that while "disc bulges and herniations alone do not constitute a serious injury . . . Plaintiff submitted additional evidence relating to the extent or degree of her limitations."

Summary of this case from Cabarris v. Knight Transp., Inc.
Case details for

Sweeney v. United States

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN M. SWEENEY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 22, 2018

Citations

14-CV-402-A (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 22, 2018)

Citing Cases

Cabarris v. Knight Transp., Inc.

See Toure, 98 N.Y.2d at 353 (finding that a plaintiff established a serious injury under the…

Howard v. United States

The defendant argues that these range of motion measurements should not be considered because Dr. Tetro…