From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sutton v. Tate

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 12, 2023
1:23-cv-00330-CDB (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-00330-CDB (HC)

05-12-2023

FRANK P. SUTTON, Petitioner, v. TATE, Respondent.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge and this action has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker for all purposes. (Doc. 9).

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THIS CASE

On May 11, 2023, Petitioner Frank P. Sutton filed a status report (Doc. 13) in which he represented that all issues raised in his petition are “resolved” and his petition is “moot.” Respondent thereafter filed a stipulation concurring that the action may be dismissed as moot. (Doc. 14).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is dismissed without prejudice; and

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sutton v. Tate

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 12, 2023
1:23-cv-00330-CDB (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Sutton v. Tate

Case Details

Full title:FRANK P. SUTTON, Petitioner, v. TATE, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 12, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-00330-CDB (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2023)