From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Suphankomut v. Chi-Teh Yu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2009
66 A.D.3d 1360 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. CA 08-02328.

October 2, 2009.

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Paula L. Feroleto, J.), entered October 3, 2008 in a medical malpractice action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants' motions to vacate the note of issue and certificate of readiness and denied defendants' application to conduct two nonparty depositions.

CONNORS VILARDO, LLP, BUFFALO (AMY C. MARTOCHE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CHI-TEH YU, M.D.

RICOTTA VISCO, BUFFALO (JOHN BLAND OF COUNSEL), BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT MICHAEL HOCKO, M.D.

ROACH, BROWN, MCCARTHY GRUBER, P.C., BUFFALO (MATTHEW J. BATT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS JEAN G. HAAR, D.D.S., M.D. AND BUFFALO MEDICAL GROUP, P.C.

GIBSON, MCASKILL CROSBY, LLP, BUFFALO (JENNIFER L. NOAH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS RAYMOND V. PAOLINI, JR., M.D. AND BUFFALO OTOLARYNGOLOGY GROUP, P.C.

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Present: Hurlbutt, J.P., Centra, Fahey, Pine and Gorski, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motions are granted and the note of issue and certificate of readiness are vacated, and the second ordering paragraph is vacated.

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendants' motions seeking to vacate the note of issue and certificate of readiness. Defendants sought the relief within 20 days after service of the note of issue and certificate of readiness, and they provided affidavits establishing that discovery was incomplete when the note of issue and certificate of readiness were filed. Thus, "a material fact in the certificate of readiness [was] incorrect" ( 22 NYCRR 202.21 [e]; see Shoop v Augst, 305 AD2d 1016, 1017; see also Aviles v 938 SCY Ltd., 283 AD2d 935). We therefore reverse the order insofar as appealed from, grant defendants' motions and vacate the note of issue and certificate of readiness, and vacate the second ordering paragraph to permit the further discovery sought by defendants.


Summaries of

Suphankomut v. Chi-Teh Yu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2009
66 A.D.3d 1360 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Suphankomut v. Chi-Teh Yu

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY SUPHANKOMUT, as Administrator of the Estate of AMPHAN PHETDUM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 2, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 1360 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 6915
885 N.Y.S.2d 673

Citing Cases

Place v. Chaffee-Sardinia Volunteer Fire Co.

It is well established that a note of issue should be vacated when it is based upon a certificate of…

Donald v. Ahern

Here, the certificate of readiness stated that discovery was complete. Because we agree with defendant that…