Opinion
ORDER SUMMARILY REMANDING IMPROPERLY-REMOVED ACTION
GEORGE H. KING, District Judge.
The Court will remand this unlawful detainer action to state court summarily because defendant removed it improperly.
On May 21, 2014, defendant Jose Jimenez, having been sued in what appears to be a routine unlawful detainer action in California Superior Court, lodged a Notice of Removal of that action to this Court, and also presented an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court has denied the latter application under separate cover because the action was not properly removed. To prevent the action from remaining in jurisdictional limbo, the Court issues this Order to remand the action to state court.
Jose Jimenez is not actually named as a defendant in the Complaint to be removed, although he characterizes himself as a defendant in the Notice of Removal. Attached to the Notice of Removal is a Prejudgment Claim of Right to Possession filed by Jose Jimenez in the action to be removed. For purposes of this order, the Court refers to Jimenez as the "defendant."
Simply stated, plaintiff could not have brought this action in federal court in the first place, in that defendant does not competently allege facts supplying either diversity or federal question jurisdiction, and therefore removal is improper. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a); see Exxon Mobil Corp v. Allapattah Svcs., Inc., 545 U.S. 546, 563, 125 S.Ct. 2611, 162 L.Ed.2d 502 (2005). Here, defendant has asserted federal question jurisdiction as his basis for removal, but the unlawful detainer action to be removed does not actually raise any federal legal question. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1441; Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson, 478 U.S. 804, 808, 106 S.Ct. 3229, 92 L.Ed.2d 650 (1986) ("the question for removal jurisdiction must... be determined by reference to the well-pleaded complaint'").
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) this matter be REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, 275 Magnolia Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90802, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c); (2) that the Clerk send a certified copy of this Order to the state court; and (3) that the Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.