Opinion
Record No. 1705-00-1.
March 13, 2001.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of Suffolk Rodham T. Delk, Jr., Judge.
(C. Edward Roettger; Curt G. Spear; Beverly Brooks; Office of City Attorney, on brief), for appellant. Appellant submitting on brief.
No brief for appellee.
Present: Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judge Bumgardner and Senior Judge Hodges.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
This matter arises out of a petition filed by the City of Suffolk Department of Social Services (Department) to terminate Orlando Ellis' parental rights in his minor daughter. After the City of Suffolk Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court denied the Department's petition, the Department appealed to the Suffolk Circuit Court. After closing arguments, the circuit court also denied the petition. The Department appeals from that ruling.
Counsel for the Department drafted the order for the June 13, 2000 ruling on the City Attorney's Office stationary. At the end of the order denying the Department's petition, the Department's counsel signed the order "We ask for this."
Having expressly agreed with the trial court's conclusions, the Department is now precluded from complaining of attendant error. "'The [Department], having agreed upon the action taken by the trial court, should not be allowed to assume an inconsistent position.'" Manns v. Commonwealth, 13 Va. App. 677, 679, 414 S.E.2d 613, 615 (1992) (quotingClark v. Commonwealth, 220 Va. 201, 214, 257 S.E.2d 784, 792 (1979)). The Department's "Written Statement of Facts/Evidence" likewise fails to preserve the Department's objections for appeal.
"The burden is upon the appellant to provide us with a record which substantiates the claim of error. In the absence thereof, we will not consider the point." Jenkins v. Winchester Dep't of Soc. Servs., 12 Va. App. 1178, 1185, 409 S.E.2d 16, 20 (1991). Based upon the record before us, we find no evidence that the Department preserved any issues for appeal. Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is affirmed.
Affirmed.