From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stumbo v. Roe

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jun 12, 2020
943 N.W.2d 647 (Mich. 2020)

Summary

allowing the township supervisor and treasurer to challenge whether a particular candidate for township clerk was eligible for placement on the ballot

Summary of this case from League of Women Voters of Mich. v. Sec'y of State

Opinion

SC: 161433 COA: 353695

06-12-2020

Brenda STUMBO and Larry Doe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Karen Lovejoy ROE, Defendant, and Heather Jarrell Roe, Defendant-Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Stumbo v. Roe

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jun 12, 2020
943 N.W.2d 647 (Mich. 2020)

allowing the township supervisor and treasurer to challenge whether a particular candidate for township clerk was eligible for placement on the ballot

Summary of this case from League of Women Voters of Mich. v. Sec'y of State
Case details for

Stumbo v. Roe

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA STUMBO and LARRY DOE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KAREN LOVEJOY ROE…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Jun 12, 2020

Citations

943 N.W.2d 647 (Mich. 2020)

Citing Cases

League of Women Voters of Mich. v. Sec'y of State

See, e.g., Stumbo v. Roe , 332 Mich. App. 479, 957 N.W.2d 830 (2020) (Docket No. 353695), lv. den. 505 Mich.…

Hart v. State

Intelistaf Healthcare, Inc. , 292 Mich. App. 51, 61-62, 807 N.W.2d 354 (2011) ; Wardell v. Hincka , 297 Mich.…