Stuart v. Associated Grocers Inc.

Full title: Barbara A. STUART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED GROCERS INC., a…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 13, 2001

21 F. App'x 772 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

21 Fed.Appx. 772 (9th Cir. 2001) Barbara A. STUART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED GROCERS INC., a Washington corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 00-36016. D.C. No. CV-00-1174-JCC. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. November 13, 2001

Submitted November 5, 2001. ^*

* The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington John C. Coughenour, Chief Judge, Presiding.

Before KLEINFELD, McKEOWN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Barbara Stuart appeals pro se the summary judgment of the district court in her action alleging wrongful termination and employment discrimination. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review summary judgment de novo. Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc). The district court properly interpreted the collective bargaining agreement.

Stuart's remaining contentions lack merit.

Page 773.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.