From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stribling v. Rowe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 30, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-01277-YGR (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 16-cv-01277-YGR (PR)

11-30-2016

AARON LAMONT STRIBLING, Plaintiff, v. DR. ROWE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On October 14, 2016, the Court issued an Order of Dismissal with Leave to Amend. Specifically, the Court granted Plaintiff twenty-eight days from the date of the Order to amend his complaint to give him an opportunity to prove that he exhausted all of his claims against each Defendant. Plaintiff was warned that the failure to timely file an amended complaint would result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. The time for Plaintiff to file his amended complaint has passed, and no amended complaint has been filed. Taking into account the salient factors set forth in Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992), the Court finds that dismissal is warranted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Yourish v. Cal. Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 989, 992 (9th Cir. 1999) (affirming dismissal of action following plaintiff's failure to amend complaint after receiving leave to do so, where the interest in expeditious resolution of litigation, the court's management of its docket, and avoiding prejudice to defendants favored dismissal).

If and when Plaintiff is prepared to pursue his claims, he may file a new civil rights action. The limitations period to file a section 1983 action in California is two years, but it is tolled for up to two years during a continuous period of incarceration. See Silva v. Crain, 169 F. 3d 608, 610 (9th Cir. 1999) (holding, pursuant to Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 340(3), that the limitations period for filing a section 1983 action in California is one year); S.B. 688 (amending Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 340(3) and adding section 335.1 to establish two-year residual limitations period for personal injury actions); Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 352.1(a) (providing for an additional two years of tolling during a period of continual imprisonment). --------

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint in the above-captioned action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment, terminate all pending motions and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 30, 2016

/s/_________

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Stribling v. Rowe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 30, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-01277-YGR (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2016)
Case details for

Stribling v. Rowe

Case Details

Full title:AARON LAMONT STRIBLING, Plaintiff, v. DR. ROWE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 30, 2016

Citations

Case No. 16-cv-01277-YGR (PR) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2016)