From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Street v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 7, 2005
909 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 4D05-2589.

September 7, 2005.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Richard I. Wennet, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 91-8325 CFA02 91-11552 CFA02.

Mark L. Street, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Although it does not appear that appellant previously raised these specific Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 claims, as the trial court's order suggests, the issues raised are meritless nonetheless. See Studnicka v. State, 679 So.2d 819, 822 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (stating that habitual felony offender sentence pronounced after October 1, 1988 is not a sentence governed by sentencing guidelines); Cooper v. State, 902 So.2d 945, 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (any error in guidelines scoresheet harmless when defendant is sentenced as habitual offender). Furthermore, appellant agreed to a negotiated plea and sentence.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, C.J., WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Street v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 7, 2005
909 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Street v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mark L. STREET, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 7, 2005

Citations

909 So. 2d 604 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

McGee v. State

As the state correctly observes, any error in a guidelines scoresheet is harmless when the defendant is…