From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stembridge v. Preferred Risk Mutual

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 8, 1998
778 So. 2d 995 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 96-2807

Opinion filed April 8, 1998 JANUARY TERM 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Dade County; Alan L. Postman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 92-13319 CA.

Affirmed.

L. Daniel Ferrer of Lyons Farrar, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellant.

Richard Gomez of Law Offices of Roland Gomez, Miami Lakes, for Appellee-Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Company of Iowa.


We affirm an order denying a motion to vacate a judgment of dismissal. The action was dismissed with prejudice on January 9, 1995, following a series of amended complaints. On August 2, 1996, Stembridge moved to vacate the judgment based on mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b)(1). The court entered the order denying the motion without a hearing.

Stembridge argues that the court erred by denying his motion without conducting a hearing. See Aetna Life Cas. Co. v. Thorn, 319 So.2d 82, 84 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). However, a hearing on the merits of the motion was unnecessary because the August 2, 1996 motion was untimely filed. Rule 1.540(b) provides that a motion under the provisions applicable here must be made not more than one year after entry of the judgment. The judgment from which he sought relief was filed on January 9, 1995. Thus, the rule required Stembridge to file his motion to vacate the judgment by January 9, 1996.

We recognize that the judgment of dismissal was on appeal to this court until the mandate was issued July 31, 1995. However, an appeal does not stay the one year period for filing the rule 1.540(b) motion. See Flemenbaum v. Flemenbaum, 636 So.2d 579, 580 n. 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Legler v. Kwitney Kroop Scheinberg, P.A., 520 So.2d 95, 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). In any event, the motion to vacate was filed more than a year after that mandate. Therefore, the judgment of dismissal must be affirmed.

POLEN, MARK and KLEIN, LARRY, Associate Judges, concur.


Summaries of

Stembridge v. Preferred Risk Mutual

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 8, 1998
778 So. 2d 995 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Stembridge v. Preferred Risk Mutual

Case Details

Full title:JOHN M. STEMBRIDGE, Appellant, v. PREFERRED RISK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 8, 1998

Citations

778 So. 2d 995 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Stembridge v. Mintz

Although the verdict in that case was in Stembridge's favor, he was unhappy with the result and appealed the…