From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Legler v. Kwitney, Kroop Scheinberg

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 17, 1988
520 So. 2d 95 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Summary

construing similarly worded provision of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540

Summary of this case from Myles v. Department of H R Serv

Opinion

No. 87-0627.

February 17, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Frank Orlando, J.

David Wm. Boone and Michael S. Davis of Boone Davis, P.A., Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

Valerie Shea of Conrad, Scherer James, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


This is an appeal from an order denying relief under rule 1.540(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.

More than one year passed between the entry of a judgment of dismissal for want of prosecution and filing of the post judgment motion. A motion seeking relief from a judgment due to mistake, surprise, inadvertence, or excusable neglect must be filed "not more than one year after the judgment." Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(b). An earlier appeal in this case, dismissed as untimely filed, did not toll the time for filing the motion under rule 1.540(b). Seven-up Bottling Co. of Miami v. George Construction Corp., 153 So.2d 11 (Fla.3d DCA 1963).

We find insufficient support in the record to conclude that the judgment was void. Therefore, we cannot apply a reasonable time standard rather than the one-year limitation required by the rule. The order of the trial court is affirmed.

DELL, J., concurs.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents without opinion.


Summaries of

Legler v. Kwitney, Kroop Scheinberg

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 17, 1988
520 So. 2d 95 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

construing similarly worded provision of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540

Summary of this case from Myles v. Department of H R Serv
Case details for

Legler v. Kwitney, Kroop Scheinberg

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH LEGLER, APPELLANT, v. KWITNEY, KROOP SCHEINBERG, P.A., APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 17, 1988

Citations

520 So. 2d 95 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Stembridge v. Preferred Risk Mutual

However, an appeal does not stay the one year period for filing the rule 1.540(b) motion. See Flemenbaum v.…

Myles v. Department of H R Serv

The trial court was correct in its conclusion that the motion was untimely. See Seven-Up Bottling Co. of…