Summary
In Steele v. Lippman, 115 N.Y.S. 1099, it was held that the broker did not have to show, in order to recover compensation for procuring the loan, that the proposed lender was able and willing to carry out his offer where the client refused to go on with the transaction as that is presumed.
Summary of this case from Hays v. Goodman-Leonard Realty Co.Opinion
16–CV–645 16–CV1–25
01-10-2018
Cheryl STEELE v. S. MICAH SALB & LIPPMAN, SEMESKER & SALB, LLC
DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
Affirmed