From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Steele v. S. Micah Salb & Lippman, Semesker & Salb, LLC

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Jan 10, 2018
179 A.3d 868 (D.C. 2018)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Steele v. Lippman, 115 N.Y.S. 1099, it was held that the broker did not have to show, in order to recover compensation for procuring the loan, that the proposed lender was able and willing to carry out his offer where the client refused to go on with the transaction as that is presumed.

Summary of this case from Hays v. Goodman-Leonard Realty Co.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

16–CV–645 16–CV1–25

01-10-2018

Cheryl STEELE v. S. MICAH SALB & LIPPMAN, SEMESKER & SALB, LLC

DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed

Summaries of

Steele v. S. Micah Salb & Lippman, Semesker & Salb, LLC

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Jan 10, 2018
179 A.3d 868 (D.C. 2018)

In Steele v. Lippman, 115 N.Y.S. 1099, it was held that the broker did not have to show, in order to recover compensation for procuring the loan, that the proposed lender was able and willing to carry out his offer where the client refused to go on with the transaction as that is presumed.

Summary of this case from Hays v. Goodman-Leonard Realty Co.
Case details for

Steele v. S. Micah Salb & Lippman, Semesker & Salb, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Cheryl STEELE v. S. MICAH SALB & LIPPMAN, SEMESKER & SALB, LLC

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Date published: Jan 10, 2018

Citations

179 A.3d 868 (D.C. 2018)

Citing Cases

Sugarman v. Kearns

The procuring of such a conditional acceptance by plaintiffs was not such a performance of the brokers' duty…

Sugarman v. Fraser

Under such circumstances, while the plaintiffs might be entitled to commissions earned by obtaining a…

6 Citing Cases