Staten v. Tx. Workforce Comm.

Full title: JOHNNY DWAYNE STATEN, Appellant v. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION, Appellee

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Oct 21, 2004

No. 02-04-103-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 21, 2004)

Opinion

No. 02-04-103-CV

Delivered: October 21, 2004.

Appeal from the 48th District Court of Tarrant County.

Panel D: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ¹ AND JUDGMENT

1 See Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.

PER CURIAM.

On September 9, 2004, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). See Tex.R.App.P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).