From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Young

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 1, 2024
No. 2024-UP-142 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 1, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-142 Appellate Case 2021-001349

05-01-2024

The State, Respondent, v. Da Juan Rayshard Young, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, all for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted April 1, 2024

Appeal From Greenville County Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, all for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and VERDIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Young

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 1, 2024
No. 2024-UP-142 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 1, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Young

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Da Juan Rayshard Young, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: May 1, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-UP-142 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 1, 2024)