Opinion
2015-UP-349
07-15-2015
The State, Respondent, v. Ray Charles Warren, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2013-002251
Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Christina Catoe Bigelow, both of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Submitted March 1, 2015
Appeal From Greenville County Robin B. Stilwell, Circuit Court Judge
Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Christina Catoe Bigelow, both of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM
Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Forrester, 343 S.C. 637, 642, 541 S.E.2d 837, 840 (2001) ("In most cases, [m]aking a motion in limine to exclude evidence at the beginning of trial does not preserve an issue for review because a motion in limine is not a final determination. The moving party, therefore, must make a contemporaneous objection when the evidence is introduced." (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)); State v. Dicapua, 373 S.C. 452, 455, 646 S.E.2d 150, 152 (Ct. App. 2007) (holding when a party affirmatively states it has no objection to evidence being admitted at trial, it has waived any previous objections made in a pretrial motion), affd, 383 S.C. 394, 680 S.E.2d 292 (2009); State v. Norris, 253 S.C. 31, 40, 168 S.E.2d 564, 568 (1969) (holding an objection "came too late because it was made after the objectionable evidence had been admitted").
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
FEW, C. J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, J.J., concur.