State v. Vanover

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Glenn Edwin Vanover, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 23, 2013

Appellate Case No. 2012-212998 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-212998 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-481

12-23-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Glenn Edwin Vanover, Appellant.

Katherine Carruth Goode, of Winnsboro, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Julie Kate Keeney, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Lexington County

Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Katherine Carruth Goode, of Winnsboro, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Julie Kate Keeney, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693 (2003) ("[F]or an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court]." (emphasis added)); id. at 142, 587 S.E.2d at 693-94 ("Issues not raised and ruled upon in the trial court will not be considered on appeal." (emphasis added)); Jackson v. Speed, 326 S.C. 289, 306, 486 S.E.2d 750, 759 (1997) ("[I]t is the responsibility of trial counsel to preserve issues for appellate review."). AFFIRMED.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.