From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 7, 2023
No. 2023-UP-229 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 7, 2023)

Opinion

2023-UP-229 Appellate Case 2021-000843

06-07-2023

The State, Respondent, v. Tobias Marquez Thomas, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted May 1, 2023.

Appeal From Aiken County Jocelyn Newman, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 7, 2023
No. 2023-UP-229 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 7, 2023)
Case details for

State v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Tobias Marquez Thomas, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 7, 2023

Citations

No. 2023-UP-229 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 7, 2023)