From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Tackett

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 2, 2022
No. 2022-UP-084 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 2, 2022)

Opinion

2022-UP-084 Appellate Case 2019-001284

03-02-2022

The State, Respondent, v. Pamela Michelle Tackett, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 1, 2022

Appeal From Laurens County Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

THOMAS, GEATHERS, and VINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Tackett

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 2, 2022
No. 2022-UP-084 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 2, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Tackett

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Pamela Michelle Tackett, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 2, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-UP-084 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 2, 2022)