From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Stokes

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Sep 4, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2011-190427 (S.C. Ct. App. Sep. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2011-190427 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-348

09-04-2013

The State, Respondent, v. John Stokes, Appellant.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. Tommy Evans, Jr. and Matthew C. Buchanan, both of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Sumter County

Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge


APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Tommy Evans, Jr. and Matthew C. Buchanan, both of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

Appellant's assertion that the circuit court ordered Appellant "to pay money owed in the form of a civil judgment" is not substantiated by the record on appeal. Therefore, Appellant's request that this court remand this appeal for a hearing regarding the amount of debt owed is denied.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
--------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Stokes

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Sep 4, 2013
Appellate Case No. 2011-190427 (S.C. Ct. App. Sep. 4, 2013)
Case details for

State v. Stokes

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. John Stokes, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 4, 2013

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2011-190427 (S.C. Ct. App. Sep. 4, 2013)