In State v. Spencer, No. 29176, 2009 WL 1888943, at *1 (App. July 2, 2009) (SDO), the defendant was convicted of disorderly conduct, but argued on appeal that the State failed to show that he intended to cause physical inconvenience or alarm by a member or members of the public.
Summary of this case from State v. KaeoNo. 29176.
July 2, 2009.
Summary Dispositional Orders Affirmed.
In State v. Spencer, No. 29176, 2009 WL 1888943, at *1 (App. July 2, 2009) (SDO), the defendant was convicted of disorderly conduct, but argued on appeal that the State failed to show that he intended to cause physical inconvenience or alarm by a member or members of the public.
Summary of this case from State v. KaeoFull title:State v. Spencer
Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Date published: Jul 2, 2009
When McCloud was yelling by the gate of the residence and in the street, including when he persisted in…
State v. KaeoIt is unclear from the record whether the individuals involved with the convoy were employees of DKIST. In…