From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Solorio

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Apr 24, 2024
332 Or. App. 246 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)

Opinion

A180933

04-24-2024

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JULIO CESAR SOLORIO, Defendant-Appellant.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Peter G. Klym, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent.


This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

Submitted March 8, 2024

Douglas County Circuit Court 22CR36078 George William Ambrosini, Judge.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Peter G. Klym, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent.

Before Lagesen, C. J., and Egan, J. L AGE SEN, C. J.

LAGESEN, C. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of probation violation. His appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour, 311 Or. 434, 814 P.2d 1069 (1991). The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We affirm.

As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge panel. See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or.App. 563, 484 P.3d 1098 (2021) (deciding matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v. Nooth, 254 Or.App. 402, 295 P.3d 115 (2012), rev den, 353 Or. 747 (2013) (same).

In July 2022, based on conduct involving a minor, defendant pleaded no contest to coercion, ORS 163.275, and third-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.415. The trial court imposed a stipulated sentence of 36 months of probation. In December 2022, defendant's probation officer alleged that defendant violated the terms of his probation. After a hearing, the trial court found that the state carried its burden regarding three of the four allegations of probation violations. The trial court continued probation, sentenced defendant to serve 30 days in custody, and added new conditions of probation.

Having reviewed the record, including the trial court file and the transcript of the hearings, and having reviewed the Balfour brief, and taking into account our statutorily circumscribed authority to review, see ORS 138.105, we have identified no arguably meritorious issues.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Solorio

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Apr 24, 2024
332 Or. App. 246 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)
Case details for

State v. Solorio

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JULIO CESAR SOLORIO…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon

Date published: Apr 24, 2024

Citations

332 Or. App. 246 (Or. Ct. App. 2024)