From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 24, 2021
2021-UP-054 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-054

02-24-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Thomas Allen Smith, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2018-001133

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted February 1, 2021

Appeal From Greenwood County Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 24, 2021
2021-UP-054 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Thomas Allen Smith, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 24, 2021

Citations

2021-UP-054 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2021)