From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Santana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 4, 2007
44 A.D.3d 340 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 1626.

October 4, 2007.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki A. Scherer, J.), entered on or about April 7, 2006, which denied defendant's motion for resentencing under the 2005 Drug Law Reform Act, unanimously affirmed.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Gayle Pollack of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Susan Axelrod of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Catterson and Kavanagh, JJ.


The court correctly denied defendant's motion on the ground that he was less than three years from his parole eligibility date when he filed the motion, and we decline defendant's invitation to revisit our holding to that effect in People v Bautista ( 26 AD3d 230, appeal dismissed 7 NY3d 838). Since defendant was clearly ineligible, as a matter of law, for resentencing, there was no reason for the court to assign counsel or conduct a hearing.


Summaries of

State v. Santana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 4, 2007
44 A.D.3d 340 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Santana

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PEDRO SANTANA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 4, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 340 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7360
841 N.Y.S.2d 875