From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ruff

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 27, 2018
2018-UP-285 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 27, 2018)

Opinion

2018-UP-285

06-27-2018

The State, Respondent, v. Kenny Octavis Ruff, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-000136

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted May 1, 2018

Appeal From Newberry County Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C. J, and WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ, concur


Summaries of

State v. Ruff

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 27, 2018
2018-UP-285 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 27, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Ruff

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Kenny Octavis Ruff, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 27, 2018

Citations

2018-UP-285 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 27, 2018)