From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rothwell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 1, 2023
No. 2023-UP-045 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2023)

Opinion

2023-UP-045 Appellate Case 2020-001444

02-01-2023

The State, Respondent, v. Joshua Thomas Rothwell, Appellant.

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 1, 2023

Appeal From Florence County D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

KONDUROS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Rothwell

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Feb 1, 2023
No. 2023-UP-045 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2023)
Case details for

State v. Rothwell

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Joshua Thomas Rothwell, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 2023

Citations

No. 2023-UP-045 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2023)