From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ramos

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Jan 30, 2013
254 Or. App. 748 (Or. Ct. App. 2013)

Summary

exercising its discretion in similar circumstances

Summary of this case from State v. B. Y. (In re B. Y.)

Opinion

10C44058 A147535.

2013-01-30

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Trinidad RAMOS, Defendant–Appellant.

Marion County Circuit Court. John B. Wilson, Judge. Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Eric Johansen, Senior Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.



Marion County Circuit Court.
John B. Wilson, Judge.
Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Eric Johansen, Senior Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before ARMSTRONG, Presiding Judge, and DUNCAN, Judge, and BREWER, Judge pro tempore.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of several crimes, including assault in the second degree with a firearm. On that conviction, the trial court imposed an upward durational departure sentence of 144 months' imprisonment and 36 months' post-prison supervision. On appeal, defendant asserts various sentencing-related errors, among them that the court erred in imposing sentence on his second-degree assault conviction because the sentence exceeds the statutory maximum for the offense. He acknowledges that he failed to preserve that claim of error for appeal but urges us to correct it as error apparent on the record. ORAP 5.45(1); see also Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or. 376, 381–82, 823 P.2d 956 (1991). The state concedes that the court erred in sentencing defendant on that conviction and that a remand for resentencing is warranted in this case. We agree, accept the state's concession, and exercise our discretion to correct the error.

Assault in the second degree is a Class B felony. ORS 163.175(2). Under ORS 161.605(2), the “maximum term of an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment” for a Class B felony is 10 years, or 120 months. Here, the trial court imposed an upward durational departure sentence of 144 months' imprisonment on defendant's conviction for that offense, thus exceeding the statutory maximum. That is error apparent on the record. See, e.g., State v. Longenecker, 175 Or.App. 33, 36, 27 P.3d 509,rev. den., 332 Or. 656, 36 P.3d 973 (2001); State v. Skelton, 153 Or.App. 580, 593, 957 P.2d 585,rev. den., 327 Or. 448, 964 P.2d 1030 (1998). Moreover, because the error could have a significant effect on defendant's sentence, it can be corrected with a minimum of judicial resources, and the state has no interest in defendant serving an unlawful sentence, we exercise our discretion to correct it. See State v. Medina, 234 Or.App. 684, 691, 228 P.3d 723 (2010); Skelton, 153 Or.App. at 593, 957 P.2d 585. Accordingly, we remand the entire case to the trial court for resentencing. ORS 138.222(5). Given that disposition, we need not address defendant's other assignments of error.

Second-degree assault is also a Ballot Measure 11 offense with a mandatory minimum prison term of 70 months. ORS 137.700(2)(a)(G). A trial court may impose a sentence under the sentencing guidelines that is greater than the mandatory minimum sentence specified by Ballot Measure 11. State ex rel. Huddleston v. Sawyer, 324 Or. 597, 604, 932 P.2d 1145 (1997); see alsoORS 137.700(1) (“The court may impose a greater sentence [than the specified minimum] if otherwise permitted by law[.]”).

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.




Summaries of

State v. Ramos

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Jan 30, 2013
254 Or. App. 748 (Or. Ct. App. 2013)

exercising its discretion in similar circumstances

Summary of this case from State v. B. Y. (In re B. Y.)

exercising its discretion in similar circumstances

Summary of this case from State v. B. Y. (In re B. Y.)
Case details for

State v. Ramos

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Trinidad RAMOS…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: Jan 30, 2013

Citations

254 Or. App. 748 (Or. Ct. App. 2013)
295 P.3d 176

Citing Cases

State v. Staniford

E.g., State v. Carter, 272 Or.App. 161, 162-63, 354 P.3d 764 (2015); State v. Ramos, 254 Or.App. 748,…

State v. Snyder

See, e.g. , State v. Carter , 272 Or. App. 161, 354 P.3d 764 (2015) (correcting an excessive sentence under…