Summary
explaining Supreme Court's rejection of burden-shifting analysis
Summary of this case from La Manna v. City of CorneliusOpinion
November 7, 2001
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 7, 2001
332 Or. 656 (Or. 2001)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 7, 2001
332 Or. 656 (Or. 2001)
explaining Supreme Court's rejection of burden-shifting analysis
Summary of this case from La Manna v. City of Corneliusreviewing unpreserved sentencing error even though correcting the defendant's sentence still "will most likely result in defendant's imprisonment for the rest of his life"
Summary of this case from State v. Gibsondistinguishing mixed-motive from pretext claims under state discrimination law
Summary of this case from Durham v. City of PortlandCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Nov 7, 2001
Citations
332 Or. 656 (Or. 2001)
Citing Cases
State v. Jaehnig
The state argues that Fugate is distinguishable from this case because defendant is alleged to have committed…
La Manna v. City of CorneliusHowever, because, as explained below, we agree with plaintiff's alternative argument, we need not address…