Opinion
2012-UP-618
11-21-2012
The State, Respondent. v. Tammy Pond, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2011-202531
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. J. Benjamin Aplin, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Submitted October 1, 2012
Appeal From Aiken County Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
J. Benjamin Aplin, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Pond appeals the revocation of her probation, arguing the circuit court erred because her failure to make court ordered payments was not willful, and the circuit court failed to make a finding on the record that the failure was willful. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: S.C. Code Ann. § 24-21-460 (2007) (providing the circuit court has the option to "revoke the probation or suspension of sentence" and "require the defendant to serve all or a portion only of the sentence imposed"); State v. Allen, 370 S.C. 88, 94, 634 S.E.2d 653, 655 (2006) ("The determination of whether to revoke probation in whole or part rests within the sound discretion of the [circuit] court."); State v. Hamilton, 333 S.C. 642, 648, 511 S.E.2d 94, 97 (Ct. App. 1999) ("Probation is a matter of grace; revocation is the means to enforce the conditions of probation."); id. at 648-49, 511 S.E.2d at 97 ("[B]efore revoking probation, the circuit [court] must determine if there is sufficient evidence to establish that the probationer has violated [the] probation conditions."); id. at 649, 511 S.E.2d at 97. ("It is only when probation is revoked solely for failure to pay fines or restitution that a finding of willfulness is mandatory.").
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
AFFIRMED.
SHORT, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.