From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Pearson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 23, 2022
No. 2022-UP-132 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)

Opinion

2022-UP-132 Appellate Case 2020-000376

03-23-2022

The State, Respondent, v. Curtis Channing Pearson, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted January 1, 2022.

Appeal From Sumter County George M. McFaddin, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, C.J., MCDONALD, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur


Summaries of

State v. Pearson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 23, 2022
No. 2022-UP-132 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Pearson

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Curtis Channing Pearson, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 23, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-UP-132 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 23, 2022)