From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Parkhurst

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Mar 1, 2017
Appellate Case No. 2015-002404 (S.C. Mar. 1, 2017)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2015-002404 Memorandum Opinion No. 2017-MO-002

03-01-2017

The State, Respondent, v. Tiphani Marie Parkhurst, Petitioner.

Appellate Defender Lara M. Caudy, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General David Spencer, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal from Spartanburg County
R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge

REVERSED

Appellate Defender Lara M. Caudy, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General David Spencer, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Parkhurst, Op. No. 2015-UP-446 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Sept. 9, 2015), affirming Petitioner Tiphani Marie Parkhurst's conviction and sentence for trafficking in methamphetamine based on evidence of theoretical yield, which the State relied on to prove Petitioner attempted to possess ten grams or more of methamphetamine. We reverse pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and for the reasons expressed in our opinion resolving the appeal of Petitioner's codefendant. See State v. Cain, Op. No. 27694 (S.C. Sup. Ct. filed Jan. 5, 2017) (Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 1 at 22) (holding the trial court should have granted Cain's motion for a directed verdict because the State presented no "evidence showing Cain could actually have produced ten grams or more of methamphetamine with the equipment and ingredients he had at his disposal").

"A person who knowingly . . . attempts to become in actual or constructive possession of ten grams or more of methamphetamine . . . is guilty of a felony which is known as trafficking in methamphetamine . . . ." S.C. Code Ann. § 44-53-375(C) (Supp. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted). --------

REVERSED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, JJ., and Acting Justices Costa M. Pleicones and James E. Moore, concur.


Summaries of

State v. Parkhurst

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Mar 1, 2017
Appellate Case No. 2015-002404 (S.C. Mar. 1, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Parkhurst

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Tiphani Marie Parkhurst, Petitioner.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Mar 1, 2017

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2015-002404 (S.C. Mar. 1, 2017)