From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Norman

COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA
May 2, 2017
799 S.E.2d 72 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017)

Summary

holding that trial court committed plain error by failing to define assault element of assault on a law enforcement officer in its initial instruction to jury and when jury subsequently asked for clarification

Summary of this case from State v. Solomon

Opinion

No. COA16-1005

05-02-2017

STATE of North Carolina v. Ailkeem Anthony NORMAN

Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Special Deputy Attorney General Douglas W. Corkhill, for the State. Irons & Irons, P.A., Greenville, by Ben G. Irons II, for defendant-appellant.


VACATED AND REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL IN 13 CRS 050005; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING IN 13 CRS 50004.


Summaries of

State v. Norman

COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA
May 2, 2017
799 S.E.2d 72 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017)

holding that trial court committed plain error by failing to define assault element of assault on a law enforcement officer in its initial instruction to jury and when jury subsequently asked for clarification

Summary of this case from State v. Solomon
Case details for

State v. Norman

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. AILKEEM ANTHONY NORMAN

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: May 2, 2017

Citations

799 S.E.2d 72 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

State v. Solomon

Ordinarily the reading of the pertinent statute, without further explanation, is not sufficient.Id. (citation…