From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Newman

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 22, 1992
823 P.2d 454 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

D9100127T; CA A68096

Argued and submitted September 19, 1991

Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated and remanded for resentencing January 22, 1992

Appeal from District Court, Washington County.

Nancy W. Campbell, Judge.

Michael Curtis, Hillsboro, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Yuanxing Chen, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Deits, Judge.


PER CURIAM

Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated and remanded for resentencing.


Defendant seeks modification of the sentence imposed after his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010(1). He contends that the court lacked authority to impose a 10-day jail term as a condition of probation. We agree and remand for resentencing.

In State v. Oary, 109 Or. App. 580, 820 P.2d 857 (1991), we held that ORS 813.020 does not authorize probation in DUII cases. A 10-day jail term as a condition of probation is also not authorized. State v. Zern, 110 Or. App. 562, 822 P.2d 161 (1992).

Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated and remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Newman

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 22, 1992
823 P.2d 454 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Newman

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. TYNDEL JAY NEWMAN, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 22, 1992

Citations

823 P.2d 454 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
823 P.2d 454