From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Nesbit

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 14, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2014-001231 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2015)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2014-001231 Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-483

10-14-2015

The State, Respondent, v. Henry Oliver Nesbit, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Charleston County
Deadra L. Jefferson, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California., 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Nesbit

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 14, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2014-001231 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Nesbit

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Henry Oliver Nesbit, Jr., Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 14, 2015

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2014-001231 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 14, 2015)