From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Nelson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 26, 2003
80 P.3d 543 (Or. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

00CR2711FE; A117845.

Argued and submitted October 31, 2003.

Filed: November 26, 2003.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Douglas County. Thomas W. Kolberg, Judge.

David C. Degner, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Office of Public Defense Services.

Laura S. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and ORTEGA, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


Defendant appeals from a judgment finding him guilty except for insanity of first-degree burglary and placing him within the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) for a period of time not to exceed 20 years. ORS 161.327. Defendant argues that the trial court was limited to imposing the maximum sentence that he could have received under the sentencing guidelines for the crime of burglary in the first degree. We affirm.

In State v. Brooks , 187 Or. App. 388, 397, 67 P.3d 426, rev den, 335 Or. 578 (2003), which presented a different issue but required interpretation of ORS 161.327, we examined the legislative history of the statute and concluded that "the length of PSRB jurisdiction [is] to be measured by the statutory indeterminate maximum sentence rather than by the guidelines presumptive sentence." Our analysis in Brooks is dispositive of defendant's arguments in this case.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Nelson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 26, 2003
80 P.3d 543 (Or. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

State v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JAMES MARTIN NELSON, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 26, 2003

Citations

80 P.3d 543 (Or. Ct. App. 2003)
80 P.3d 543