Summary
holding that the term "accepted condition" in ORS 656.268(b) refers to the "accepted injury"
Summary of this case from Brown v. Saif Corp. (In re Brown)Opinion
July 29, 2003
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jul 29, 2003
335 Or. 578 (Or. 2003)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jul 29, 2003
335 Or. 578 (Or. 2003)
holding that the term "accepted condition" in ORS 656.268(b) refers to the "accepted injury"
Summary of this case from Brown v. Saif Corp. (In re Brown)holding that the concept of "attenuation" can operate to purge the taint of an illegality where the facts demonstrate an event later than and independent of the illegal conduct between the evidence in question and the illegality that would have led to the discovery of the evidence in question
Summary of this case from State v. Dinsmoresentencing errors deemed harmless and the defendant not prejudiced, as trial court certain to impose the same term of 117 months in prison on remand
Summary of this case from State v. Garlitzdeclining to exercise discretion to review a sentencing error, because the court would have imposed the same sentence in any event
Summary of this case from State v. Toquerodeclining to exercise discretion to correct a sentencing error because it was "certain" that, on remand, the trial court would restructure the defendant's sentences so as to achieve the same sentence that it originally imposed
Summary of this case from State v. Johnsonapplying canon
Summary of this case from Kerr v. BradburyCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jul 29, 2003
Citations
335 Or. 578 (Or. 2003)
74 P.3d 112
Citing Cases
State v. Wilson
Id. Rather, "such interests are defined by an objective test that asks whether the government’s conduct would…
State v. Van OsdolStaleness is an important factor when considering probable cause, because "probable cause must exist at the…