State v. Moise

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Mario Chanel Moise, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 31, 2021

2021-UP-102 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-102

03-31-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Mario Chanel Moise, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2019-001172

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted March 1, 2021

Appeal From York County Daniel Dewitt Hall, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.