From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Miller-Kirkland

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 25, 2022
638 S.W.3d 122 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

WD 83372

01-25-2022

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William M. MILLER-KIRKLAND, Appellant.

Michael J. Gunter, for Appellant. Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, for Respondent.


Michael J. Gunter, for Appellant.

Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Division One: W. Douglas Thomson, Presiding Judge, Alok Ahuja, Judge and Karen King Mitchell, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

William M. Miller-Kirkland appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County convicting him of first-degree murder and armed criminal action. Miller-Kirkland raises two points on appeal. First, he argues that the trial court plainly erred by failing to sua sponte intervene and issue a corrective instruction following the State's closing argument. Second, he argues that the trial court plainly erred in submitting to the jury an instruction on intoxication by drugs. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum to the parties which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Miller-Kirkland

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 25, 2022
638 S.W.3d 122 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

State v. Miller-Kirkland

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. William M. MILLER-KIRKLAND, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jan 25, 2022

Citations

638 S.W.3d 122 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Citing Cases

Miller-Kirkland v. State

We affirmed Miller-Kirkland's convictions in a per curium order ("PCO"). State v. Miller-Kirkland, 638…