State v. McKever

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Austen Syntell McKever, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 17, 2016

Appellate Case No. 2014-002707 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 17, 2016)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2014-002707 Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-060

02-17-2016

The State, Respondent, v. Austen Syntell McKever, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Tiffany Lorraine Butler, of Columbia; and Austen Syntell McKever, pro se, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Florence County
D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Tiffany Lorraine Butler, of Columbia; and Austen Syntell McKever, pro se, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.