From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McKennie

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 3, 2023
No. 2023-UP-168 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 3, 2023)

Opinion

2023-UP-168 Appellate Case 2021-000382

05-03-2023

The State, Respondent, v. Anthony Tyrone McKennie, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Sarah Elizabeth Shipe, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted April 1, 2023

Appeal From Orangeburg County Edgar W. Dickson, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Sarah Elizabeth Shipe, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, C. J, and GEATHERS and VERDIN, JJ, concur.


Summaries of

State v. McKennie

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 3, 2023
No. 2023-UP-168 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 3, 2023)
Case details for

State v. McKennie

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Anthony Tyrone McKennie, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: May 3, 2023

Citations

No. 2023-UP-168 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 3, 2023)