From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McGee

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jan 25, 2012
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-047 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 25, 2012)

Opinion

2012-UP-047

01-25-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Nathaniel McGee, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia; for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted January 3, 2012

Appeal From Charleston County Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia; for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Nathaniel McGee appeals his conviction for murder, arguing the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that McGee should be given the benefit of every reasonable doubt after the jury asked for further instruction on the first element of self-defense. Additionally, McGee filed a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. McGee

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jan 25, 2012
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-047 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 25, 2012)
Case details for

State v. McGee

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Nathaniel McGee, Appellant.

Court:THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Citations

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-047 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 25, 2012)