From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. McClure

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 1, 2024
No. 2024-UP-145 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 1, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-145 Appellate Case 2022-000347

05-01-2024

The State, Respondent, v. Bobby Ray McClure, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and Bobby Ray McClure Jr., pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted April 1, 2024

Appeal From York County J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and Bobby Ray McClure Jr., pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

THOMAS, MCDONALD, AND VERDIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. McClure

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 1, 2024
No. 2024-UP-145 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 1, 2024)
Case details for

State v. McClure

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Bobby Ray McClure, Jr., Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: May 1, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-UP-145 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 1, 2024)