State v. Mauney

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Shelly Mauney, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 8, 2012

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-478 (S.C. Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2012)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-478

08-08-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Shelly Mauney, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD

NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY

PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Horry County

Larry B. Hyman, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Shelly Mauney appeals her conviction of second-degree burglary, arguing the circuit court erred in denying her motion for a directed verdict because the State failed to bring evidence that Mauney lacked consent to enter the building burglarized. After a thorough review of the record and brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.