From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mattocks

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
May 23, 2018
Docket No. 45572 (Idaho Ct. App. May. 23, 2018)

Opinion

Docket No. 45572 2018 Unpublished Opinion No. 470

05-23-2018

STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MEGAN ANN MATTOCKS, Defendant-Appellant.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth Ann Allred, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.


Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Samuel A. Hoagland, District Judge. Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for burglary, affirmed. Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth Ann Allred, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge

____________________

PER CURIAM

Megan Ann Mattocks pled guilty to burglary. Idaho Code § 18-1401. The district court sentenced Mattocks to a unified term of ten years with two years determinate. Mattocks appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Mattocks also filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion which the district court denied. Mattocks does not address the denial of this motion as an issue on appeal. --------

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Mattocks' judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Mattocks

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
May 23, 2018
Docket No. 45572 (Idaho Ct. App. May. 23, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Mattocks

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MEGAN ANN MATTOCKS…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Date published: May 23, 2018

Citations

Docket No. 45572 (Idaho Ct. App. May. 23, 2018)