State v. Manago

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Tony Dequan Manago, Jr., Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 31, 2021

Appellate Case No. 2019-000580 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 31, 2021)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2019-000580 Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-104

03-31-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Tony Dequan Manago, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Darlington County
Roger E. Henderson, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.