From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mack

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 21, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2014-000620 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2015)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2014-000620 Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-495

10-21-2015

The State, Respondent, v. Joseph Mack, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, and Joseph Mack, Jr., pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Berkeley County
Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, and Joseph Mack, Jr., pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Mack

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 21, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2014-000620 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Mack

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Joseph Mack, Jr., Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 21, 2015

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2014-000620 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2015)