From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Mack

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 21, 2015
2015-UP-495 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2015)

Opinion

2015-UP-495

10-21-2015

The State, Respondent, v. Joseph Mack, Jr., Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2014-000620

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, and Joseph Mack, Jr., pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted August 1, 2015

Appeal From Berkeley County Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, and Joseph Mack, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Mack

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 21, 2015
2015-UP-495 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Mack

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Joseph Mack, Jr., Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 21, 2015

Citations

2015-UP-495 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2015)