State v. Lucas

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Steve Lucas, Appellant.

Court: THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: May 30, 2012

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-339 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 30, 2012)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-339

05-30-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Steve Lucas, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant. J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal from Lancaster County

William Jeffrey Young, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Steve Lucas appeals the circuit court's order revoking his probation, arguing the circuit court abused its discretion in revoking his probation when he was unable to secure admission in an in-patient treatment program. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.