From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Lori T.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 13, 2020
335 Conn. 956 (Conn. 2020)

Opinion

10-13-2020

STATE of Connecticut v. LORI T.

Megan L. Wade, assigned counsel, Hartford, in support of the petition. Denise B. Smoker, senior assistant state's attorney, Rocky Hill, in opposition.


Megan L. Wade, assigned counsel, Hartford, in support of the petition.

Denise B. Smoker, senior assistant state's attorney, Rocky Hill, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 197 Conn. App. 675, 232 A.3d 13 (2020), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court incorrectly conclude that General Statutes § 53a-98 (a) (3) was not unconstitutionally vague as applied to the defendant?

"2. Did the Appellate Court incorrectly conclude that the evidence presented was sufficient to prove that the defendant "otherwise refuse[d] to return" her children?"

ROBINSON, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

State v. Lori T.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 13, 2020
335 Conn. 956 (Conn. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Lori T.

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. LORI T.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Oct 13, 2020

Citations

335 Conn. 956 (Conn. 2020)
239 A.3d 319

Citing Cases

State v. Lori T.

And (2) "[d]id the Appellate Court incorrectly conclude that the evidence presented was sufficient to prove…